Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
8/8/2024, 1:04:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Tom
@TomTomClub510
·
528d
@GaryMarcus Come on, Gary… at least let me finish my coffee before getting me all worked up. $50 billion… with a B.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
528d
Five years and well over $50B wasted on multiple companies doing almost exactly the same things with almost exactly same algorithms and almost exactly the same data and achieving almost exactly the same results and encountering almost exactly the same problems while monopolizing…
Vincent Valentine (CEO of Cognitive.ai)
@BitValentine
·
528d
@GaryMarcus Does overhyping AGI divert resources from pressing AI challenges? Or foster unrealistic expectations? Discuss.

The statement is part of a broader discussion on the allocation of resources in AI research, particularly regarding AGI (Artificial General Intelligence). The conversation critiques the significant financial investments in AGI and questions the efficiency and outcomes of these investments. The statement in question adds to this discourse by suggesting that the actual costs, including power, staff, and legal expenses, are even higher than initially mentioned.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a factual correction or addition to the ongoing discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on financial and operational aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By providing additional information, the statement promotes understanding and contributes to a more informed discussion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding a relevant point to the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]