Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
8/8/2024, 1:05:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Tim Armstrong
@timmur_
·
528d
@GaryMarcus When do we hit the wall with this approach? I unbelievable that everyone keeps ponying up.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
528d
Five years and well over $50B wasted on multiple companies doing almost exactly the same things with almost exactly same algorithms and almost exactly the same data and achieving almost exactly the same results and encountering almost exactly the same problems while monopolizing…
Vincent Valentine (CEO of Cognitive.ai)
@BitValentine
·
528d
@GaryMarcus Does overhyping AGI divert resources from pressing AI challenges? Or foster unrealistic expectations? Discuss.

The statement 'It’s not when we hit it - it is when we face facts' is part of a broader discussion about the skepticism surrounding the timelines and promises of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The conversation critiques the significant investments in AGI and the repeated failures to achieve the promised results. The statement emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the reality of the situation rather than continuing to invest in unproven approaches.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by encouraging a realistic assessment of the situation, which can prevent further waste of resources. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by urging a fact-based approach, which can lead to more informed and effective decision-making. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue of overhyping AGI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for a more realistic and responsible approach to AGI development, which can benefit society by redirecting resources to more pressing AI challenges. [+1]