Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the support for SB 1047, a legislative bill concerning AI safety. The statement also addresses common misconceptions about the bill and aligns with a broader conversation involving prominent researchers and lawmakers.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions, as it focuses on clarifying misconceptions and supporting a legislative bill aimed at public safety. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by addressing confusion about the bill, thereby fostering a more informed public dialogue. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging disagreements with certain researchers on scientific matters but does not resort to personal attacks. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advocating for the passage of SB 1047, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society, aiming to enhance AI safety regulations. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]