Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the conversation it refers to engage in public discourse about the realism of AI-generated images and their implications. The tone of the statement is somewhat critical and highlights a perceived incongruity in the AI-generated images, specifically pointing out the attire of a woman in a bathing suit at a tech conference. The intent appears to be to draw attention to the limitations or flaws in AI image generation, possibly questioning the appropriateness or realism of such depictions.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as indirectly perpetuating stereotypes or biases about appropriate attire in professional settings. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but may not fully respect the dignity of the individuals depicted, as it focuses on their attire in a potentially critical manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on a perceived flaw rather than fostering a constructive dialogue about the technology. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on the depicted individuals' professionalism based on their attire. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.