Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques media coverage and calls for equal scrutiny of public figures, specifically comparing the coverage of Biden's cognition to Trump's neurological state. It engages with public issues related to media bias, journalistic integrity, and political accountability, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as critical of media practices.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on media practices rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote fairness and accountability in media coverage, which can foster understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of media practices without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for better media practices, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform to address perceived media bias responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.