Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
8/9/2024, 3:47:58 PM
X
In reply to:
Adam Shame
@AdamShame3
·
532d
@GaryMarcus A video of a person reaching for words to describe the breathtaking state of US politics is not an argument.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
532d
@AdamShame3 that’s a pejorative label, not a counterargument.
Adam Shame
@AdamShame3
·
532d
@GaryMarcus TDS is very real, it seems.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
532d
And they were willing to consider one hypothesis but willfully blind to the other and for once their hypocrisy is biting them in the behind.
Gary Bradski
@grbradsk
·
532d
@GaryMarcus The Right were ... right that Biden was bygone. What they failed to notice is that Trump now vs Trump in late 90s shows an alarming decline.

The statement '@AdamShame3 it is EXACTLY the argument his followers used re Biden. if you can’t see the symmetry, it is you has become blind. TDS takes new meaning.' is part of a broader conversation about the cognitive abilities of political figures, specifically Biden and Trump. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, and it engages in a public debate about political issues, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses accusatory language ('it is you has become blind') and a pejorative term ('TDS'). [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it engages in a form of cyberbullying by using derogatory language. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is confrontational and dismissive. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it uses the platform to attack rather than engage in meaningful dialogue. [-2]