Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue—AI regulation—and calls for legislative action. The tone is serious and informative, aiming to raise awareness about the lack of regulations on AI systems compared to other industries.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for regulations that could prevent potential risks associated with AI systems. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the need for oversight and care in AI development to prevent catastrophic risks. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by presenting a reasoned argument for the need for AI regulation without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the influence of top researchers to advocate for societal betterment through legislative action. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to inform the public about an important issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.