In reply to:
Justin Minich
@AxonSpark
路
532d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
532d
The statement 'Not ruling that out given the sequelae' is part of a conversation discussing the perceived changes in Elon Musk's public persona. The conversation references a tweet by Elon Musk about Tesla's achievements in LGBTQ equality. The tone of the statement is speculative and somewhat critical, suggesting that the changes in Musk's behavior might be a result of certain consequences or events.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative change in a public figure's behavior, which could be seen as critical.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment, but it does speculate on a public figure's persona.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.聽[-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but does not provide a detailed argument or evidence, making it somewhat speculative.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.