Gary Marcus

The statement in question is a reply in a conversation thread that involves a public figure and a political topic, which can be considered public discourse. The tone of the statement is informal and potentially derogatory, and it appears to question the eligibility of a person referred to as 'Satan' in a previous tweet. The content does not provide substantive engagement with the public issue of the 2028 election but rather engages in a potentially inflammatory and disrespectful manner.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses a derogatory term ('Shit') and does not strive to do no harm with words, potentially inciting negative reactions. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not respect the dignity of others and engages in a form of cyberbullying by referring to someone as 'Satan.' [-2]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. [-2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and can be seen as a personal attack. [-2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does not use the platform responsibly and lacks integrity. [-2]