In reply to:
The statement 'What’s your metric for relevance?' is a direct and neutral question seeking clarification on the criteria for determining the most relevant reply. It does not engage in public discourse as it does not address any societal issues, policies, or public concerns. Instead, it is a straightforward inquiry related to the context of the original post by @KettlebellDan.
- The statement does no harm and is neutral in tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it is a simple question.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does not detract from these values either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement is constructive and seeks clarification without engaging in personal attacks.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not involve any mistakes to acknowledge or correct.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, but it is not intended to.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.