Gary Marcus

The statement '@RemmeltE @willie_agnew See previous comment re divisiveness' is part of a larger conversation about technical AI governance and the need for inclusive and constructive dialogue. The tone is corrective and aims to address perceived divisiveness in the conversation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to reduce harm by addressing divisiveness, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By calling out divisiveness, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion, although it could be more explicit in fostering these values. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the tone of the conversation without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to encourage a more constructive dialogue. [+1]