Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 94
8/10/2024, 4:29:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Sᴛᴇᴠᴇɴ Wɪʟʟɪᴀᴍꜱᴏɴ
@scarce_sense
·
408d
@marwilliamson @shanebarnes People who say what's true will never pass the vetting stage. As you're well aware through personal experience.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
@shanebarnes Start electing people who say what’s true. Refuse to acquiesce to the machinery of lies that passes for ethical politics and media in the country today.
Shane Barnes
@shanebarnes
·
408d
@marwilliamson So long as our politicians can be bought and paid for it’s going to continue! How can we put a stop to that, Marianne?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
Just as a majority of Republicans as well as Democrats support Medicare for All and tuition free college and tech school, a majority support public schools serving free breakfast and lunch.

The American people are not the problem; we’re decent and intelligent and prefer a…
Zaid Jilani
@ZaidJilani
·
409d
YouGov 2023 poll: Most Americans believe that public schools should supply free breakfast and free lunch. Providing it for low-income students only is a minority position. No students is a fringe position.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the feasibility of achieving significant social and political changes, drawing historical parallels to argue that seemingly impossible goals can be achieved. The tone is assertive and optimistic, aiming to inspire belief in the possibility of change.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by promoting a positive outlook on achieving social change, thus aligning with this principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by referencing historical struggles for justice and equality, encouraging a broader perspective on current issues. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by respectfully addressing a differing opinion and providing historical context to support its argument, avoiding personal attacks. [+2]