Marianne Williamson

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 98
8/10/2024, 4:38:46 PM
X
In reply to:
Bhakti Ware
@Hyper_Health
·
408d
When the REAL Marianne Williamson speaks (as opposed to the political version) it’s always brilliant. She’s spot on here.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
408d
The FDA has rejected MDMA for the treatment of post traumatic stress. That’s because it’s corporate captured by Big Pharma, who with its ubiquitous promotion of SSRI’s sees unacceptable competition from MDMA, etc.

When there’s so much money made preying on people’s unhappiness,…

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the FDA's rejection of MDMA for the treatment of post-traumatic stress and the influence of Big Pharma. The tone is somewhat dismissive and sarcastic, particularly with the phrase 'doppleganger crystal lady bs,' which could be interpreted as disrespectful.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. The dismissive and sarcastic tone could be harmful, especially if directed at a public figure or their supporters. (-2 points) [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others and borders on cyberbullying or harassment by using derogatory language like 'doppleganger crystal lady bs.' (-2 points) [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses sarcasm and dismissiveness, which can hinder constructive dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to a personal attack by mocking the individual rather than addressing the argument. (-2 points) [-2]