Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/11/2024, 6:07:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus I don’t see anything controversial there

On the specific topic I’m asking what protecting equity in AI means
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan Stuff like this? Seems ok to me, given the nation’s history.
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus What does “protecting equity” mean to you?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan What is it you are imagining and how does it relate to any policy actually proposed in the Biden administration? With SB-1047 I have seen so much misinformation I am sick to my stomach.
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus idk “protecting equity in AI” seems very Orwellian to me
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan I feel very confident in people like Arathi Prabhakar who would bring continuity from current administration. Trump’s judgements, not so sure.

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a substantive discussion about public policy, specifically the concept of 'protecting equity in AI' and its implications. The conversation touches on the Biden administration's policies and the broader societal issue of equity, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is part of a respectful dialogue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by expressing support for the AI Bill of Rights and engaging in a discussion about equity. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue, asking for clarification and expressing opinions without personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to discuss important societal issues, contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly. [+1]