Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/11/2024, 6:13:01 PM
X
In reply to:
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus But what does it mean?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan Ain’t my phrase. But I really like the WH Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights.
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus I don’t see anything controversial there

On the specific topic I’m asking what protecting equity in AI means
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan Stuff like this? Seems ok to me, given the nation’s history.
Dan 🇺🇸
@KettlebellDan
·
537d
@GaryMarcus What does “protecting equity” mean to you?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@KettlebellDan What is it you are imagining and how does it relate to any policy actually proposed in the Biden administration? With SB-1047 I have seen so much misinformation I am sick to my stomach.

The statement and the conversation it is part of constitute public discourse as they engage with the topic of equity in AI and related policies, which are significant public issues. The tone of the conversation is inquisitive and seeks clarification on the meaning and implications of 'protecting equity' in the context of AI and broader societal policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation strives to do no harm as it is focused on understanding and clarifying a public policy issue without any hostile or harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by seeking to clarify the meaning of 'protecting equity' and discussing its implications in a respectful manner. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive dialogue, asking questions and providing responses without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]