Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to U.S. foreign policy, military aid, and human rights concerns. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and influence public opinion on these matters.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by making strong accusations without providing detailed evidence, potentially inciting anger or hostility. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against AIPAC and members of Congress, which could be seen as disrespectful. (-1 point) [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; rather, it takes a confrontational stance. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping accusation without inviting discussion or providing a nuanced argument. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to bring attention to a significant issue, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by raising awareness. (+1 point) [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the accusatory tone may undermine the responsible and integrity aspects. (0 points)Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.