Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes an opponent for seeking support from specific groups and individuals, using strong language to describe them. It touches on public issues such as political alliances and campaign funding, making it part of public discourse.
- The statement uses strong, negative language ('shameful,' 'vile') which could be seen as harmful and divisive, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the opponent or the groups mentioned, referring to them in derogatory terms. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses inflammatory language that could deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.