The statement by @babyjocko constitutes public discourse as it engages with the topic of revolution and societal change, referencing historical events and quoting a public figure to substantiate the argument. The tone is assertive and the intent is to argue for the possibility of a non-violent revolution in the USA.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It advocates for non-violence, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm.
[+2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding and empathy by referencing successful non-violent movements and suggesting that a similar approach could be viable in the USA.
[+2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive dialogue by responding to a previous comment and providing historical context. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
[+2]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by discussing a significant societal issue and advocating for non-violence.
[+2]