Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
8/12/2024, 9:35:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus If you’re talking about this letter, I did read it:
Robby Starbuck
@robbystarbuck
·
537d
EU Commission member @ThierryBreton is basically blackmailing @elonmusk in an attempt to stop his @realDonaldTrump Spaces event.

Every globalist wants a weak, subservient USA. This is why you see them pulling every trick they can to attack President Trump and Elon.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@olivia_p_walker Read the actual letter he is criticizing and what it actually seeks to enjoin. The letter is not talking about random bits of policy.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus I think what Jones did to the families of those kids was abhorrent. But I do not take his comment to mean what you suggest.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Translation: Alex Jones wants Trump and Musk to be free to incite violence, worldwide.
Alex Jones
@RealAlexJones
·
537d
The EU is publicly interfering in U.S. elections.

The statement by @olivia_p_walker addresses a public issue related to the regulation of online platforms and the prevention of incitement to violence. The conversation involves multiple participants discussing the implications of a letter from the European Commission to Elon Musk regarding compliance with the Digital Services Act (DSA). The statement's tone is analytical and aims to clarify the intent behind the letter, suggesting that it is focused on preventing incitement to violence, which one participant found objectionable.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the content of the letter and its intent rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the intent behind the letter and addressing a public concern about incitement to violence. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the content of the letter and the concerns raised by another participant without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to contribute to a better understanding of the issue at hand, which is the regulation of online platforms to prevent incitement to violence. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by engaging in a responsible and informed discussion about the letter and its implications. [+1]