Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
8/12/2024, 10:18:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus I appreciate your follow-up because I see those differently. To me, this is fundamentally about a foreign power seeking to censor or control speech between Americans and relating to an American election (Trump is a candidate). Within the constitutional framework in which the U.S.…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@olivia_p_walker It is fundamentally about discouraging incitement to violence, mentioned twice. Jones evidently found that to be objectionable.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus If you’re talking about this letter, I did read it:
Robby Starbuck
@robbystarbuck
·
537d
EU Commission member @ThierryBreton is basically blackmailing @elonmusk in an attempt to stop his @realDonaldTrump Spaces event.

Every globalist wants a weak, subservient USA. This is why you see them pulling every trick they can to attack President Trump and Elon.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
@olivia_p_walker Read the actual letter he is criticizing and what it actually seeks to enjoin. The letter is not talking about random bits of policy.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus I think what Jones did to the families of those kids was abhorrent. But I do not take his comment to mean what you suggest.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
Translation: Alex Jones wants Trump and Musk to be free to incite violence, worldwide.

The statement by @olivia_p_walker addresses the jurisdictional authority of the EU over content broadcast within its borders, particularly in relation to a planned broadcast involving a U.S. presidential candidate. The statement is part of a broader discussion about the implications of EU regulations on free speech and the potential for foreign influence on American political discourse. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify the limits of EU jurisdiction.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm and is focused on clarifying jurisdictional boundaries, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By addressing jurisdictional boundaries, the statement promotes understanding and empathy regarding the complexities of international regulations and their impact on free speech. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a counterpoint to the previous comments, without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to clarify important legal and jurisdictional issues, contributing to the betterment of societal understanding of these topics. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech by discussing the limits of jurisdictional authority and the implications for content regulation, using the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+1]