Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
Nick Gillespie
@nickgillespie
·
289d
The statement and the linked conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue: the FDA's decision regarding MDMA-assisted therapy for PTSD. The tone is supportive and determined, aiming to provide a balanced perspective and rally support for those affected by PTSD.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a balanced perspective and supporting those affected by PTSD. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the plight of 350 million people suffering from PTSD and expressing determination to continue the fight. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the FDA's decision without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for the betterment of society by supporting innovative treatments for PTSD. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a significant public health issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.