Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement addresses public issues related to the conduct and regulations of members of Congress, making it a part of public discourse. The tone is assertive and aims to propose specific reforms while criticizing an opponent for not supporting these reforms.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but it does criticize an opponent, which could be seen as a negative action. However, the criticism is issue-based rather than personal. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on public actions and policies rather than personal attacks. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of specific policy proposals and the reasons behind them, which can foster empathy and compassion for those who support these reforms. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting policy differences with an opponent. However, it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment through proposed reforms aimed at increasing transparency and accountability in Congress. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss public issues with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.