Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement by @ThinkScrappy and the subsequent reply by @GaryMarcus constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about the appropriateness of addressing public figures and the implications of such language. The tone of the reply by @GaryMarcus is confrontational and includes personal insults, which detracts from constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using personal insults. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in personal attacks. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is needlessly confrontational. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement by @GaryMarcus does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue at hand. [-2]