The statement by @ThinkScrappy and the subsequent reply by @GaryMarcus constitute public discourse as they engage in a debate about the appropriateness of addressing public figures and the implications of such language. The tone of the reply by @GaryMarcus is confrontational and includes personal insults, which detracts from constructive dialogue.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement by @GaryMarcus violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions by using personal insults.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement by @GaryMarcus does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in personal attacks.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement by @GaryMarcus does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is needlessly confrontational.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement by @GaryMarcus does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue at hand.
[-2]