Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/13/2024, 2:19:49 PM
X
In reply to:
ihor gowda
@ihorgowda
·
537d
@Short_This_Now @GaryMarcus BWAHAHAHA
DEI Hire Kari
@Short_This_Now
·
537d
@GaryMarcus Are we going to pretend Harris is *not* and 80 IQ imbecile?

She hasn't had a press conference or interview in 24 days. That's hardly an 'accident', now is it?

She was invited to the Musk conversation and DECLINED.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
537d
So we ARE just going to pretend that Trump is *not* in cognitive decline?

How’s that going to work out?
Kurt Andersen
@KBAndersen
·
537d
After one nominee dropped out for seeming too elderly, I don’t understand how a reporter writes and editors publish a 900+ word article about the other nominee’s 2-hour talk and its “technical problems” without mentioning its salient stylistic feature—his continuous slurring.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the cognitive abilities of a political figure and the potential implications for their candidacy. The tone is serious and concerned, reflecting on the possibility of the individual becoming President again despite perceived cognitive decline.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a concern about the functioning of a political figure, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by raising awareness about a potential issue. However, it also indirectly contributes to the stigmatization of cognitive decline. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy of the individual to some extent but does engage in a public discussion about their cognitive abilities, which could be seen as a violation of their dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the negative aspects of the individual's cognitive abilities. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing a concern about the individual's ability to function well in a significant public role. However, it could be seen as a personal attack rather than a constructive dialogue.