Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a public discussion about the capabilities and limitations of Large Language Models (LLMs), referencing opinions from notable figures in the field of artificial intelligence. It addresses a substantive issue relevant to public discourse on AI technology and its implications.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does imply a critique of LeCun's changing stance, which could be seen as a minor negative point. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It remains within the bounds of respectful discourse. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on pointing out a perceived inconsistency.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of critique but does so by highlighting a perceived inconsistency in LeCun's stance. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not address the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes directly.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement does not explicitly use influence for the betterment of society, but it does contribute to a public discussion on an important topic.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.