Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
8/13/2024, 6:48:04 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
537d
@GaryMarcus Hi Gary, not sure how you’re questioning my judgment given you — at the time of this comment — haven’t actually listened for yourself. Here’s the recording.
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
538d
In case you missed the original recording.

Skip the beginning part.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
538d
@olivia_p_walker The more I hear about what was said the more I have to question your judgment here. Are there any positive specifics?
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
538d
@GaryMarcus All you have to do is listen to the conversation to know some of that stuff is blatantly false. It was a good conversation, you should listen to the recording:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
538d
There is a STAGGERING difference between the reports on Trump-Musk here (enthusiastic!) and on Reddit (absolutely scathing).

Makes you wonder if people even listened to the same conversation.

(I alternately got time-outs and heard zip when I tried to tune in.)

The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the public perception and content of a conversation involving prominent figures. The statement questions the judgment of another user and seeks specific positive details to counterbalance negative reports.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly. It is a request for clarification and specifics, which is a constructive approach. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by seeking specific information to form a balanced opinion. It encourages a more nuanced view rather than accepting scathing reports at face value. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism and dialogue. It questions the judgment of another user but does so by asking for specific positive details, which is a reasonable approach to disagreement. [+1]