Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of how language can convey respect or disrespect, particularly in the context of addressing public figures. The tone is somewhat confrontational and suggests that the original poster lacks understanding of sociolinguistics.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause direct harm but could be seen as dismissive or condescending, which might indirectly cause harm by escalating the conversation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of the original poster, as it implies a lack of knowledge in a somewhat dismissive manner. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it suggests that the original poster needs education, which could be seen as patronizing. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the original poster's concerns without addressing them substantively. [-1]