Gary Marcus

The statement by @BlimeyCThat constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the use of titles and names in a political context, which is a public issue. The tone of the statement is assertive and somewhat confrontational, as it threatens to mute the other user if they do not pay attention to the contrast being discussed. The intent appears to be to emphasize the importance of using formal titles for public figures and to highlight perceived disrespect in not doing so.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm, but the confrontational tone could escalate tensions, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy of others but does not fully respect their dignity due to the threat of muting, which can be seen as dismissive. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on correcting the other user in a somewhat aggressive manner. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it threatens to mute the other user, which shuts down further discussion. [-2]