Rashida Tlaib

Rank 3 of 47
|
Score 213

The statement and the linked article address a significant public issue: the impact of corporate welfare on public services in Detroit. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting that corporate welfare has had a detrimental effect on public resources such as schools and city services. The use of the term 'thievery' indicates a strong negative stance and implies unethical behavior by those benefiting from corporate welfare.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a perceived injustice, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by bringing attention to an issue that affects public welfare. However, the accusatory tone could be seen as harmful to those it targets.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the term 'thievery' could be seen as disrespectful and damaging to the dignity of those it accuses. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of the issue by providing information about the impact of corporate welfare, but the accusatory language may hinder empathy and compassion.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses strong language that could be seen as a personal attack on those benefiting from corporate welfare. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a societal issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses its platform to address a public concern, but the integrity of the discourse could be questioned due to the accusatory language.