Marianne Williamson

The statement by @benj4peace addresses a public issue, specifically the legislative process and constitutional principles related to lawmaking, in the context of a discussion about abortion laws and the Supreme Court's role. The tone is somewhat dismissive and confrontational, aiming to correct what the user perceives as a misunderstanding of constitutional law.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but is dismissive and could be seen as condescending, which may not promote a respectful dialogue. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as disrespectful.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on correcting a perceived misunderstanding in a confrontational manner. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism but does so in a way that could be perceived as a personal attack, particularly with the use of 'Holy shit' and 'Please be smarter.' [-2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech and engages in a public debate about constitutional principles, but the tone could be more respectful and constructive. [+1]