In reply to:
Ron Stevenson
@IndyRedoubt
·
450d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
450d
The statement engages in a public discourse on the topic of abortion rights and the implications of Roe v. Wade being overturned. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the perceived lack of empathy and understanding from men on the issue of abortion by suggesting that their perspective might change if they could experience pregnancy themselves.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive towards men, which might be considered a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about men, which could be seen as a minor violation of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding and empathy by suggesting that lived experience would change perspectives, which aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but rather critiques a general attitude, which aligns with this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to engage in a significant societal issue responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.