Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement by Gov. Gavin Newsom during the Democratic convention addresses a public issue, specifically the political dynamics and reactions surrounding the Democratic ticket. The tone is critical of former President Trump, suggesting he is unprepared and uncertain in response to the nomination of Kamala Harris. The statement is part of a broader political discourse and thus constitutes public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause direct harm, but it is critical and could be seen as contributing to a polarized environment. It does not explicitly violate the principle of doing no harm, but it does not actively promote it either.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It is a political critique rather than a personal attack. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticizing the opposition. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is a critical remark without offering a constructive alternative or engaging in a meaningful dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. However, the responsibility and integrity of the statement can be questioned as it leans towards political rhetoric rather than substantive discussion. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.