Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political commentary on democracy and public figures.
- The statement uses strong, negative language that could be seen as harmful, referring to a public figure as a 'grievance-obsessed buffoon' and comparing them to an irritating neighbor. This does not strive to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the public figure it criticizes, engaging in derogatory language that could be seen as a form of harassment or hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses inflammatory language that could polarize rather than foster constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing specific policies or actions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, given the derogatory and inflammatory language used. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.