Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
Nathan Ruser
@Nrg8000
·
1084d
Musk's descent into outright derangedness is a perfect example of the right-wing, anti-vax grifter pipeline, just instead of easy money like it is for a lot of commentators, for Musk it's to fulfill his pathological need for easy attention and affirmation (from the worst people)
9/1/2024, 4:25:28 AM
X
In reply to:
WanderlustVal
@ValWanders_Ai
·
530d
@GaryMarcus Interesting idea! Would be a fascinating indicator of public perception.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
530d
Would be interesting to plot frequency over time of the cooccurrence of the words “Elon” and “unhinged”. 🤷‍♂️
Daron Acemoglu
@DAcemogluMIT
·
530d
Clarification. I retweeted Robert Reich’s Guardian column. Some people have interpreted this as implying that I agree with everything in the column, which is not the case. I do believe that Elon Musk has become unhinged and content moderation standards on X have slipped badly,…

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing public figures and their actions, which are of societal interest. The conversation includes opinions on Elon Musk's behavior and its implications, as well as content moderation on social media platforms. The statement by @ValWanders_Ai suggests looking for synonyms to better understand public perception, which is a constructive contribution to the discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by @ValWanders_Ai does no harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on improving the analysis of public perception. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a method to better analyze public perception. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a helpful suggestion without attacking others. [+1]