Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the capabilities and limitations of generative AI, referencing a well-known essay by Ted Chiang. The tone is somewhat dismissive and critical, particularly towards the belief in AI's potential. The statement also includes a link to an external article for further reading, which adds depth to the discussion.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as dismissive of differing opinions, which might indirectly cause harm by stifling open dialogue. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in personal attacks or reveal private information. Adheres to principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing an external essay that provides a detailed critique of AI. However, the dismissive tone towards the opposing view could hinder empathy and compassion. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by referencing an essay that critiques AI, but the dismissive tone towards the opposing view could be seen as a minor personal attack. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.