In reply to:
Darryl Mason
@DarrylMason
·
529d
The statement engages in a discussion about the role of AI in art, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is corrective and aims to clarify a misunderstanding in the ongoing conversation.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the content of the argument rather than attacking the individual. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a careful rereading of the piece, which can foster a more informed discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the content of the argument rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.