Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement is part of a public discourse involving a debate about the accuracy of polls predicting election outcomes. The tone is competitive and somewhat dismissive, aiming to assert the superiority of one poll over another. The intent is to challenge the accuracy of another's prediction in a public forum.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the competitive and dismissive tone could contribute to a hostile environment.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and does not engage in cyberbullying or harassment, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on asserting superiority. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a form of constructive criticism by challenging the accuracy of another's poll, but the dismissive tone could be seen as a personal attack.