In reply to:
Stephen Smith
@SteveSailorMan
·
529d
The statement 'that’s a vastly more realistic estimate' is a response to a prediction about the outcome of an election. The conversation involves a discussion about polling data and predictions for the upcoming election, which is a public issue. The tone of the statement is neutral and analytical, aiming to provide an opinion on the realism of the given estimate.
- The statement does not cause harm and is a neutral opinion on the realism of an estimate. It adheres to the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion directly, but it does contribute to a factual discussion about election predictions, which can be seen as promoting understanding of public opinion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing an opinion on the realism of an estimate without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.