In reply to:
Stephen Smith
@SteveSailorMan
·
529d
The statement is part of a public discourse about the accuracy of polls and predictions related to an upcoming election. The conversation involves a bet on the accuracy of different polls, with proceeds going to charity. The tone is competitive but not hostile, and it engages with public issues such as election predictions and polling accuracy.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a friendly wager, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not directly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a civil discussion about polling accuracy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.