In reply to:
Selmar Smit
@selmarsmit
·
526d
The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) and artificial general intelligence (AGI). It addresses the public issue of AI development and its current state, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm and maintains a respectful tone, even though it disagrees with the previous comment. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the purpose and limitations of LLMs, contributing to a more informed discussion about AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the topic rather than the individual. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.