Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement and accompanying image critique the reliability of ChatGPT by highlighting an error it made in a simple task. The tone is critical and somewhat humorous, aiming to question the trustworthiness of AI in providing accurate information, especially in critical fields like medicine.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm anyone but critiques the reliability of an AI tool, which can be seen as a constructive criticism aimed at improving the tool's accuracy. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others as it does not target any individual but rather a technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by pointing out a flaw in the AI, encouraging users to be cautious and critical of the information provided by such tools. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting a specific error, which can lead to improvements and better understanding of the tool's limitations. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to raise awareness about the potential unreliability of AI in critical fields, which can contribute to the betterment of society by promoting caution and critical thinking. [+1]