Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
525d
The statement critiques the current state of AI development, particularly the reliability of large language models (LLMs) compared to traditional tools. It questions the approach taken in AI development, suggesting that despite significant investment, the results are not meeting basic expectations. The tone is critical and aims to provoke thought about the direction of AI research and investment.
- The statement does not directly harm anyone but criticizes the effectiveness of AI investments, which can be seen as a constructive critique. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the performance of AI rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the approach to AI development, the statement promotes understanding and encourages a re-evaluation of current methods, which can lead to better outcomes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to highlight a significant issue in AI development, potentially influencing future research and investment decisions. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.