Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/2/2024, 6:04:59 PM
X
In reply to:
Saif Shaikh
@SaifSha33417291
·
525d
@GaryMarcus What is the correct approach according to you?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
525d
“Let’s this about this step-by-step”

Over $50 billion dollars have been invested in LLMs.

They are still aren’t as reliable as traditional tools like databases and calculators at many basic tasks.

Are we taking the right approach to building AI?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
525d
Over $50 billion dollars invested, and our AI can’t reliably answer basic questions like this.

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the effectiveness and future direction of AI development, a significant public issue. The conversation critiques the current state of AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), and questions the approach taken in their development. The reply directs to an article for a more detailed analysis, contributing to the ongoing debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the preceding conversation do not appear to cause harm. They engage in a critical discussion about AI development, which is a legitimate and important topic. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others. It focuses on the performance of AI systems rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by directing to an article that presumably provides a detailed analysis of the issue, contributing to a more informed public debate. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive criticism of AI development. While the initial comment by @GaryMarcus uses strong language ('Total shitshow'), the subsequent discussion remains focused on the issue rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to contribute to a significant public debate about AI, which has broad societal implications. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The conversation upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important public issue. [+2]