Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement 'please read my 2022 Deep Learning is Hitting a Wall *carefully*' by @GaryMarcus in response to @medoraai's comment constitutes public discourse. The conversation revolves around the capabilities and limitations of AI, specifically the potential of scaling AI systems to achieve AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) or ASI (Artificial Superintelligence). This is a substantive engagement with a public issue that contributes to the civic dialogue on AI development and its implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a request for careful reading, which is neutral in tone. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a careful reading of a detailed analysis, which can foster informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the content of the discussion rather than attacking the individual. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to an important public debate on AI. [+1]