In reply to:
Robert Mankoff
@bob_mankoff
·
517d
AndyXAndersen
@AndyXAndersen
·
518d
The statement by @bob_mankoff in response to @AndyXAndersen's comment about the suitability of LLMs (Large Language Models) for algorithmic work constitutes public discourse. It engages in a broader discussion about the role and limitations of technology in human activities, which is a relevant societal issue.
- The statement does not cause harm; it uses a rhetorical device to make a point about the reliance on technology.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the importance of technology in various aspects of human life, though it does so in a somewhat sarcastic manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by challenging the previous comment without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.