The statement 'I wish I could say this was a parody.' in response to a conversation about a company tripling its subscription cost to pay for new features constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue related to business practices, consumer rights, and corporate ethics.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration with a business practice. It does not violate this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more of a critical remark.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It criticizes a business practice rather than individuals.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to voice a concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.