In reply to:
Max A. Little @maxlittle@mathstodon.xyz
@maxaltl
·
513d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the challenges and limitations of large language models (LLMs) and AI integration in software products, which are relevant public issues in the context of technology and consumer trust. The tone is critical but not hostile, aiming to highlight the complexity of the issues involved.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead aims to clarify the complexity of fixing issues in LLMs, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining that the problems with LLMs are not simple to fix, which aligns with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the technical challenges without resorting to personal attacks, which aligns with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.