Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement questions Microsoft's commitment to Responsible AI by referencing a news report about an AI error. The tone is critical and seeks accountability from Microsoft regarding their AI practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to hold Microsoft accountable for an AI error, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for responsible AI practices. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting a significant issue with AI, encouraging a discussion on responsible AI practices. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning Microsoft's commitment to Responsible AI without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to advocate for better AI practices, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise a valid concern about AI ethics. [+1]