In reply to:
Daryl Fairweather ⛅
@FairweatherPhD
·
133d
The statement by @FairweatherPhD constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about housing policies, a significant public issue. The statement critiques a housing plan and provides a link to an alternative proposal, contributing to the civic dialogue on housing solutions.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is a straightforward critique and provides an alternative resource. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a link to an alternative housing plan, which can help others learn about different perspectives. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out a perceived flaw in the housing plan and offering an alternative. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a public policy discussion with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.