In reply to:
Status Coup News
@StatusCoup
·
132d
The statement 'Rich.' is a brief, sarcastic reply to a conversation about the limitations of elections and the exclusion of independent voices from debates and media coverage. The tone is dismissive and does not provide substantive engagement with the public issue being discussed.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone does not contribute positively to the discourse. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is dismissive and sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a personal attack on the previous comment. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for the betterment of society; it detracts from meaningful discussion. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly; it dismisses the conversation without contributing to it. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.